Break (in C/C++ and many similar programming languages)
A statement that instructs execution to break out of a loop cycle when further looping becomes unnecessary or potentially harmful
Okay in response to
Ben's and
Christine's posts as well as the various opinions they generated I will now seek to explain and clarify the idea I was trying to bring forth in my
previous post.
Here is the essence of my argument : We each have our varied set of problems - having too much to do, being unable to work towards a dream, failing at what we expect to achieve - but they share one thing in common: They all involve intense difficulty in, or failure of, our efforts in obtaining an ideal(s). We aim at a mark identified by society or by our own inherent wants and slave away to that end (or, if this is not possible, gaze anxiously at the horizon in wait), and when we find ourselves up smack against a blank wall or climbing a seemingly insurmountable potential barrier we, naturally, cave in to frustration, cynicism and deep depression.
We wonder why is it that we cannot get what we want. We wonder why is it that despite having held on for so long, no deliverance seems to be forthcoming to reward our painful perserverence. Why must we suffer and whether there is an end. Why God implanted these desires in our beings, and yet withholds their fruit from our reaching fingers.
The fact of the matter is that ideals don't become any more reachable through the pratice of constant thought and sheer, unquenchable want. And while working towards our goals may increase our chances at winning it, the actual probability increment is measured solely by the raw effectiveness of our methods and its synergy with the other random factors of involved in the situation, NOT by the actual amount of sweat and efforts we invest. Success comes at its own time and in its own flavour, and no matter how much we would like to we are not afforded the luxury of any form of choice.
So yes, I agree with Ben and Ian that it is nigh impossible to disconnect our sense of self worth from the social forces that shape our lives, BUT I do not agree that a particular ideal (or yardstick), once identified, should have a permanent rooted position near the top of our priorities. The reasons :
- We know that if we want to have any chance of getting what we aim for we have to work for it - but what if whatever we're aiming for turns out to be unreachable? The question then is no longer that of replanting the 'yardstick' onto a location we can consider 'more successful' but that of removing the yardstick from grounds we are unable to reach despite repeated efforts on our part. Security loses its meaning if we cannot have a realistic chance for hitting the level at which security is attained.
- Plus, if our minimum level of assurance proves to be at least currently unachievable, insisting on keeping this gauge of assurance will only lead us to be fearful, insecure, and generally even less effective in our efforts as a whole. This is certainly not going to help our chances of achieving what we want in the near future and will in fact adversely affect our performance in any other endeavour we may be undertaking at that moment. The idea is maintaining fast hold and pouring insistent attention and sweat on a presently unattainable goal is tantamount to beating ourselves against a solid bolder : it won't get us through, and it will hurt us
Hence, under such considerations it becomes both rational and necessary sometimes to just let go of some things in life, however much we may desire them at some point. If something is unattainable at a particular time we should strive to recognise and admit this, and be rational enough to understand that there is nothing we can do about it and that we should be
focusing on something else - I am certain that at least for the people likely to read this blog, there will always be other things that require attention. Work on those lest you find yourself losing something else just because you wasted too much time on something that was a lost cause to begin with. I am in no way implying that letting go is easy (I've had my share of lost ideals) but my assertion is that there should be no reason to NOT work on something achievable, however lacking its appeal, on the account of something that is NOT achievable, however painfully alluring.
Back to the so termed minimum level of assurance, my point is that if this minimum level proves either unattainable or costly (to our emotional/spiritual well-being, that is) to maintain, then this level should be readjusted. Of course if we seek a readjustment that will not devalue our self worth then we will find ourselves with the question of how? - Since we acknowledge that society has laid down a rigid set of rules defining success in its terms, it would seem that redefining our inner-gauge such that it will both measure our own worth to our satisfaction AND comply by societal standards is impossible. What I am suggesting, however, is for us to simply accept a humbler view of ourselves - ie if we cant change the meter, we would lower the threshold. If we cannot change our level of success in society's rigid terms, then we quit trying to and live with a lower position in the success hierarchy - in exchange for a calmer, potentially happier life and a clearer mind. This is not easy given that everyone and anyone would like to have at least a relatively high regard for themselves and their intrinsic potentials. But a pathway that eats up all of our energy and/or spirit without giving any realistic results is no way, and we are much better off breaking out of this cycle of unhappiness and fruitlessness and walking down a path we can actually progress naturally. Put from a religious viewpoint, we should seek and walk the direction in which God intends for us to go, even if it humbles us, instead of wandering out on our own and demanding that he help us to whatever prize we find.
This is the Geodesic of Life that I talked about. Only some wounded pride, intrinsic longing and a certain degree of vanity should stand in our way of a smoother walk down the hilly roads of life.
Note:
I am not in anyway suggesting that we should not put great effort into fulfilling our ambitions, or that we should be giving up when we encounter discouraging signs during the course of our efforts. I should state here that I write this post keeping in mind that my 'target audience', sort of, do not usually have a problem with application of effort. Rather, most of us, I think, simply try way too hard sometimes.
Also if I'm not making as much sense as I'm hoping to make, then please bear with me. I have not written pieces like this in ages, plus I'm really sleepy right now~~~